Back to General Practice sessions after Day 6 Mudra session and Day 7 Pranayama session.
Viparita Karani ( headstand) appears for the first time. Later, for example in General Session #11, Sirsa asana OR Viparita Karani but there is no indication of any difference between them that I can find in the book other than that Viparita Karani refers to the Mudra form and Sirsa asana the asana. The directions seem to be the same. Elsewhere, in the mudra section Shribhashyam mentions that the exhalation in a mudra tends to be longer than the inhalation ( twice as long is suggested) and generally involving kumbhaka.
Shribhashyam claims to be following a pedagogical progression, in later sessions kumbhaka and a concentration point will be indicated as well an alternative.
I love practicing Sirsasa Asana and Sarvanga Asana, especially with variations, but I find them deeply problematic, dangerous frankly. I’m not convinced of the many benefits claimed for them and the dangers and concerns are rarely raised.
Dangers/risks may include cervical disc injury and falling out of the posture, Osteoporosis is common from our 50s onwards ( 54 million are said to suffer from it in the US alone) bones become weaker. Also eye conditions, Glaucoma is a bit of a Ninja, you can have it before you realize it. I have glaucoma myself, I stopped practicing inversions for an extended period, now practice them again but less often and with shorter stays also I’m tested regularly for any increase in Eye pressure.
At least in Ashtanga Vinyasa a great deal of strength is developed in the arms, neck and shoulders over time that can give some support to the postures but there really doesn’t seem to be much strength developed in this system. I don’t recommend them. An alternative to Sarvangasana might be Supta Pada Angusta asana ideally with the small of the back and hips flat on the mat if your hamstrings are are more flexible than mine lately),
No comments:
Post a Comment